A word ban extends beyond the CDC, theWashington Postreported last night, including at another, unnamed HHS agency that was told how to talk about the Affordable Care Act, presumably to discourage people from signing up for health care. The directive came from the White House Office of Management and Budget, which coordinates the president’s budget proposal and rule-making agenda.
On Friday,theWashington Postbroke the news(and other outlets confirmed) that CDC officials were prevented from referring to seven words when putting together the agency’s budget:vulnerable, entitlement, diversity, transgender, fetus, evidence-based,andscience-based.
If only the banning of “science-based” and “diversity” was the worst thing the Trump administration has done to science.
Additional terminology guidance given to the State Department suggests that the administration intends to pull funding from science-based HIV/AIDS prevention initiatives that work to promote abstinence-only programs instead, even though peer-reviewed researchconsistently findsthat abstinence-only programs do not delay sexual activity or change other sexual risk behaviors.
The CDC word ban was widely repudiated byscientists,senators, andpublic health advocates. The issue has attracted enormous attention (even from Cher!) as emblematic of a morally, scientifically, and ethically corrupt style of governing.
In an email to staff last night, CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald said that the CDC “remains committed to our public health mission as a science- and evidence-based institution…science is and will remain the foundation of our work.”
Yet recently, CDC scientists werebanned from responding to basic data requests from reporters without political approval—a clear violation of the agency’s scientific integrity policy.
Sidelining science since day one
This starts with words and communication, but it’s just the tip of the iceberg. Just last week, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinkesummoned the head of Joshua Tree National Park to his office for a tongue lashingover tweets the park had sent out referencing climate change. That’s right: the park director flew across the country to be reprimanded for a couple of tweets, in order to send a message to all park directors: talking about climate change isverboten.
And oh, if only word choice was the worst action this administration has taken to undermine the use of science in policy-making. They’re not just trying to downplay the phrase “evidence-based.” They’re trying to ditch the whole idea of basing policy on evidence.
In July, we chronicled howthe Trump administration has sidelined science since day one. And since then the abuses of evidence have continued to flow.
The Treasury Secretary claimed that economists were working “around the clock” to come up with analysis justifying the tax bill.They were not. The EPAbanned scientists who receive EPA grants—the ones the agency has decided do the most promising environmental and public health research—from providing science advice to the agency. The Department of Interior istrying to defund and prevent public access tothe US Geological Survey library system.
The White House has no science advisor, and the president’s Office of Science and Technology Policy is a ghost town. Numerous political appointees—including the疾病预防控制中心directorand thenominee for NOAA administrator—have financial conflicts of interest thatlead many to question their ability to do the jobs. The administration has shut down studies where it expects it won’t like the outcome: onclimate change in the tropics, onteen pregnancy prevention, and on thehealth risks of surface coal mining in West Virginia. Science agencies are targeted across the board for severe budget cuts.
一个详尽的清单,坦率地说,不可能的。President Trump’s attacks on science harm our environment and make all of us sicker and less safe. If the Trump administration won’t allow federal agencies to do their job, it’s time to ask Congress to step up its game, engage in meaningful oversight, and do its job.