It’s official. This week’s Veterans Affairs nomination leaves the Trump administration’s Secretary of Agriculture position as the last cabinet slot to be filled. With his inauguration just 7 days away, the president-elect still hasn’t announced his pick for this vital position that touches every American’s life at least three times a day.
But while we wait (andwait, andwait),看谁将运行部门形状our nation’s food and farm system, it may be instructive to take a look at what some of his other personnel choices say about his intentions in this realm. And particularly, what the Trump team could mean for two of our most basic human needs—food and water.
First, food. On the whole, today’s US agriculture system is skewed to production of commodity crops—chiefly corn and soybeans—the bulk of which become biofuel components, livestock feed, and processed food ingredients. That said, over the last 8 years we’ve seenincreased emphasis, from the White House and the USDA, on healthy eating, local food systems, and the like.
But things seem about to change, and how. The president-elect himself reportedly lives onfast food and well-done steaks. And even without an agriculture secretary nomination, Trump’s other appointees to date seem to indicate that unhealthy food and industrial farming are back in force.
Corn is king and beef is back in Trump’s America
It’s hard to believe at a time when US corn production is at anall-time high, but with Trump’s team we might actually get more of this commodity we already havetoo much of.
The Iowa Corn Growers Association hailedGovernor Terry Branstad’s selectionlast month as ambassador to China, a hireseen as a boonto that state’s corn-heavy farm sector. What does diplomacy in the Far East have to do with corn farmers in Iowa, you ask? China is already a major buyer of US farm commodities such as Iowa corn and pork, and Branstad is expected to press his“old friend” President Xito ensure that continues. (Not to be left out, the American Soybean Associationsounded happyabout the Branstad pick as well.)
The ambassador-in-waiting is already plugging corn domestically,telling Iowa Public Radioand the state’s corn farmers that Trump’s chosen EPA head will support the ethanol industry they feed. Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, you may have heard, is Trump’shighly controversial pickto head the Environmental Protection Agency (see why this is laughably unacceptablehere,here, andhere). Pruitt is an oil guy, and on Oklahoma’s behalf he has fought the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard, which boosts the ethanol industry by mandating a level of blending with gasoline. But Branstad andboth of Iowa’s Senatorssay King Corn needn’t worry.
Meanwhile, Pruitt has endeared himself to the American Farm Bureau Federation, thechief lobby group for Big Ag, with his rabidly anti-regulatory stance. The Farm Bureau cheered Pruitt’s appointment,describing itas “welcome news to America’s farmers and ranchers – in fact, to all who are threatened by EPA’s regulatory overreach.”
Read: agribusiness won’t have to deal with pesky environmental regulations under Pruitt.
Branstad’s and Pruitt’s nominations are also gifts to the meat industry, given their allegiances to the Iowa pork industry and Oklahoma beef industry respectively, as Tom Philpott over at Mother Jonesexplainedlast month.
Throw inhamburger exec Andrew Puzderas Labor Secretary and the interests of industrialized meat and its fast-food purveyors will be well represented in cabinet meetings. (See more reasons to be worried about Puzderhereandhere.)
A promise of “crystal clear water”
With the food landscape being reshaped more to Trump’s liking, let’s look briefly at water. During the campaign, candidate Trump said that as president he would ensure the country has “absolutely crystal clear and clean water.” (It’s campaign promise #194 onthis list.)
I’m glad he recognizes that clean water is a critical resource and something Americans want. But will we get it?
Probably not if it’s up to Scott Pruitt. Pruitt has sued the EPA over a slew of clean air efforts, including its气候,汞,阴霾, and ozone rules, but he hasalso been vehementin his opposition to the agency’s efforts to protect the nation’s waters from pollution. In particular, he wants to kill the Obama EPA’sClean Water Rule(also known as the “Waters of the US,” or WOTUS, regulation), which expanded the definition of waterways the federal government has the authority to protect under the Clean Water Act. Themanufacturing and fossil fuel industriesare major backers of the effort to kill the WOTUS rule, and Big Ag (in theform of the Farm Bureau) has joined them.
Is Trump’s USDA pick our last best hope for healthy food and clean water?
This brings us back to the long-delayed USDA nomination. Since the election, we’ve seen a parade of agriculture secretary hopefuls march in and out of Trump Tower. The process hasfrustrated farmersandconfounded other observers(including thecurrent USDA chief). It’s clear that the new USDA head, whoever he or she turns out to be,won’t be confirmedby the Senate until after the inauguration.
Until the president-elect makes an official announcement, it’s impossible to know where he’s going with this important position. And itisimportant. The US Department of Agriculture is a sprawling bureaucracy made up of29 agencies and offices, nearly 100,000 employees, and a budget of$155 billion in FY17. Itsvision statement:
[T]o provideeconomic opportunitythrough innovation, helping rural America to thrive; to promote agriculture production thatbetter nourishes Americanswhile also helping feed others throughout the world; and topreserve our Nation’s natural resourcesthrough conservation, restored forests, improved watersheds, and healthy private working lands.
The emphasis is mine, to highlight that the department is supposed to be looking out for the economic well-being of farmers and their communities, the health and nutrition of all Americans, and the critical natural resources—including water—that we all depend upon.
Let’s hope that whoever takes the helm at the USDA intends to do just that—even if Trump’s other cabinet picks have given us little reason for optimism.
Now, back to waiting…